On 4/23/07, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In the end, I think it's more about the kind of people who are attracted to
the project - specifically, the messy deep dark bowels of the project such
as RfA, AfD, and all things that attract trolls (e.g. articles on polemical
issues like [[George W. Bush]]). Most reasonable people hang out around
these areas for a while, decide they're not worth it, and either leave or
find their own niche on WP (mine seems to have become Malaysian articles;
it's an obscure, quiet and peaceful area of WP where I do my best to keep
politicians' biographies free from libel - not very hard when there aren't
many people editing them).
The nicest and most respectful people in the project tend to be those who
avoid the polemical areas of WP. Trouble is, if nobody mans the polemical
areas, who will? We can't surrender these things to the extremists - but the
levelheaded centrists don't have the right temperament for handling them
without burning out.
Johnleemk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Sounds to me that there's a solution there too. There's plenty of a
"silent majority" to take those over and then some. Those who are
generally good editors but occasionally lose their head and let bias
take over or get into an edit war should be forgiven. Those who POV
push or edit war frequently, on the other hand, need to get told to
shape up or leave, and if they don't do either need to get helped to
leave. And we need to be a hell of a lot quicker about it. If someone
hasn't quit edit warring after their fifth 3RR block, the sixth isn't
going to do it either.
Seraphimblade
--
Freedom is the right to know that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.