Ian Woollard wrote:
But right now the WMF doesn't have an encyclopedic
dictionary, so if
we put those articles in the Wikipedia, and labelled them, and gave
them their own policies, then the people that want to write them will
be happy, and the people that want to read them won't learn much if
any encyclopedic information, but at least they'll know what they're
getting, whereas right now the Wikipedia is implying that they're
getting encyclopedic stuff, which they really aren't.
Your opinion of what constitutes "encyclopedic stuff" differs from
that of the English Wikipedia community at large.
--
David Levy