On 3/22/06, Mathias Schindler <mathias.schindler(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/22/06, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/22/06, SJ <2.718281828(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Below is a letter that Britannica sent out today
to some of its
customers, in response to the December Nature article comparing the
accuracy of articles in Wikipedia and Britannica. A more detailed
review of the Nature study, including responses to each alleged error
and omission, is linked from the front page of
www.eb.com.
Where?
http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdf
Heh, some of the Britannica responses are quite amusing:
"Article: Pheromone
Reviewer comment: One might get the impression that a pheromone is a
substance, while it usually consists of several in a blend.
Britannica response: We do not accept this criticism. This article
does not even discuss the composition of pheromones."
What exactly is the article supposed to discuss, then?
Kirill Lokshin