private musings wrote:
Giovanni di Stefano
(
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_di_Stefano)
- and a sticking point in article work.
The implication of recent editing there is that we can no longer
mention or refer to sources like The Times, or The Guardian even on
talk pages, if they may lead readers who click on them to think worse
of the article subject.
This presents problems.
BADSOURCES anyone?
<runs immediately for cover, and means every word. Please use the
world 'Clown' instead of 'Troll' when responding to this post, and
'broohaha' instead of 'drama'>
If you already know this is a bit dramatic, could you find some way to
lessen that? For example, explaining both sides of this in a sympathetic
or NPOV way before stating your conclusion?
That would make me feel more comfortable there's an actual issue, and it
will help the people on the other side see that you have heard and
understood their side of it.
Thanks,
William
--
William Pietri <william(a)scissor.com>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_Pietri