On 5/18/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 18/05/07, Matthew Brown
<morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
True consistency would have every article on
Wikipedia having a
spoiler warning, just in case, and a half-dozen others as well.
Literally every page on Wikipedia has a link to [[Wikipedia:General
disclaimer]], which links to [[Wikipedia:Content disclaimer]], which
proclaims in big letters at the top:
WIKIPEDIA CONTAINS SPOILERS AND CONTENT YOU MAY FIND OBJECTIONABLE
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
And that's all we need. We don't have warnings to say "THIS ARTICLE
CONTAINS ANATOMICALLY CORRECT IMAGES OF HUMAN GENITALIA", and we don't
need any to say "THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS A SPOILER." If you go looking
for information on a work of fiction -anywhere- besides sites which
you clearly know avoid spoilers, you may get a faceful of spoiler.
That's true whether it's Wikipedia, a forum, or anything else. Our job
is not as a film-review or film-recommendation site, it is as an
encyclopedia. And those discuss works of fiction in full without
spoiler warnings.
--
Freedom is the right to say that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.
But we *do* discuss the stuff in full, just put a centimeter-tall
warning at the top that you can turn off with your CSS. And also, on
the images issue, I believe that [[autofellatio]] does not have the
image on the page, but on a seperate one. (I may be wrong, that
article *may* have the image on it, and is NOT AT ALL SAFE FOR WORK.)
~~~~