We don't disagree with each other all that often and we notice and
focus on the cases where we do. If something is going that way we
could all jump in.
Fred
On Jan 25, 2006, at 5:04 AM, Ryan Delaney wrote:
On 1/24/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net>
wrote:
After we see who is really on board, perhaps we can split up the
cases between two subcommittees.
Fred
This keeps coming up, but in the last big "arbcom reform" thread
that idea
got shot down because it could (and probably will) factionalize the
arbitration committee and create authoritative inconsistency
problems when
one panel receives a high-profile case and rules on it differently
than how
the other panel would have. If a similar case comes up in the
future, it
will create an environment where the result you get will be determined
significantly by which subcommittee rules on it, and that's
something we
don't want.
Ryan
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l