From: Snowspinner <Snowspinner(a)gmail.com>
On Sep 14, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Phroziac wrote:
On 9/14/05, Snowspinner
<Snowspinner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I would rather have an encyclopedia that has a
truly staggering
amount of information but that some people dismiss because it has
some silly articles than a well-respected but heavily incomplete
encyclopedia. If I wanted that, I'd just go to Britannica.
Isn't that exactly why we exist?
I always thought so.
We exist to create a great encyclopedia. I don't see how an encyclopedia
filled with, as you put it, "silly articles", can ever be considered
"great".
Jay.