If you can improve it go right ahead, but frankly there are a number
of former featured articles which have seriously deteriorated due to
subsequent unprofessional edits.
Fred
On May 26, 2006, at 12:48 PM, habj wrote:
This is from a talk page of a featured article:
" Beyond which, this is an FA, and FA's really should be treated as
more
finalized and finished than general articles, as they have passed
through a
form of peer review and have a community endorsement in their present
forms."
Is this view supported anywhere? Should I be more careful when
editing a FA,
since it should be supposed that the article is good as it is and
does not
need a change?
/habj
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l