On 11/27/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So now, in addition to the two aforementioned lists,
there's some
other set of people "colluding" privately off-wiki to take action
based on e-mails to the lists? O.K., let's assume for the moment that
this bizarrely bad-faith theory is true. What on earth does it have to
do with Wikipedia any more? Wikipedians privately e-mail each other
hundreds, perhaps thousands of times a day. What do you propose to do
about that?
For starters:
I propose that they show the community and/or the full arbcom all the
emails that led to the erroneous blocks, so we can see if the
endorsers behavior & judgment needs to be examined as well.
That seems pretty simple, yes?
Alec