geni wrote:
On 5/14/07, MacGyverMagic/Mgm
<macgyvermagic(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Of course not, but this has little bearing on ski resorts. They are
unlikely
to want
to promote the place as MySpace bands do
False. Most myspace bands are not in a position to make significant
amounts of money ski resorts are.
and since it existed longer
than any MySpace band and in all likelyhood had a much larger audience,
The same could be said for rather a lot of trees what of it?
> I'd
> say the ski resort has the edge. Also, arbitrary cut off points can be
> useful, but not if they kill the comprehensiveness of a list of all the
X's
in a
country.
Haveing a comprehensive list is not a reason to include an article on
every item.
If everything can fit comfortably in a list, why have individual
articles? And if only some are too long to fit in the list, why not have
some individual articles and some anchored redirects?
A good idea, but I still don't see the short article should be deleted. Yes,
it can be merged, and it probably should be expanded, but none of any of
these solutions involve deletion.
Mgm