On Nov 28, 2007 3:39 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/28/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 3:02 PM, Alec Conroy
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The
community is the judge and jury of every admin action.
Particularly when there is an Request for Comments from the community.
Remember us-- the community? Every admin is theoretically supposed
to have our trust?
The community can comment without seeing personal e-mails,
Heck, the community can comment without getting to see any of the
evidence! But if you actually care about what the community is going
to say, and plan to listen to it somehow, you have to show them the
evidence.
It's not clear what you're saying; what is the purpose of the RFC, in your view?
and the RfC
became moot when the RFAR was opened.
RFCs are never moot because of an RFAr. Consensus trumps Arbcom--
Arbcom's just there for those gray cases where we prior dispute
resolution couldn't come to consensus.
So once the RFAR opened, what was the purpose of the RFC?