I hardly think that's fair. I voted to keep it myself, as did some
even more respectable editors. Individuals have their individual
reasons, & they are given on the AfD page. That the guy who added the
junk has made it less likely that it will be kept is in my view
unfortunate. But I do not say he is part of any hypothetical group
devoted to indirectly discrediting the article. -- David Goodman
This may not be a real nut. There seems to be a
dedicated posse that's
hell bent on keeping [[wipipedia]] on Wikipedia at all costs, policy
be damned. This may go as far as "creative harassment" of anybody who
dares nominate their pet article. Same may be true for the other noms
you mentioned. Maybe their hope is that if people fear real life
actions from "nut cases", then nobody will dare nominate their pet
articles for deletion.
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.