Steve Bennett wrote:
Would an appropriate level of prominence for products
like this be a
fairly brief entry with URL on a "List of products of type X" article?
I suspect a case-by-case determination would need to be made, since it's
possible that there are individual products which do warrant an article.
But I haven't exactly studied the field.
PS sad observation: why do some of the biggest
arguments at Wikipedia
always get attached to the stupidest subjects: autofellatio (a
copyright dispute!), brian peppers (office),
I don't believe Peppers was an Office case, as far as I know Peppers
never actually complained or was even aware of the article. Also, Jimmy
deleted the article with the caveat that it could be recreated in a
year's time (about four months away now, mark your calendars :), which
doesn't seem like a typical Office sort of action to me.
PPS: dear future web browsing person: please do not
hold me in lesser
esteem for discussing "fleshlights" :)
And same here. :)