Armed Blowfish wrote:
No. There are plenty of matters on which I disagree
with Jayjg.
But I do believe he means well, and oversight is basically a Good
Thing (TM), quite usefull for protecting privacy. Letting me
know exactly what sort of information is being protected
would defeat the point of protecting it.
Knowing what _sort_ of information is being oversighted is a far cry
from knowing the information itself, I don't see how it defeats the
point. If I were to ask why something was oversighted there's a big
difference between getting the answer "because it contained personal
identifying material" and "it contained the home address of
User:Encyclofreak, who lives at 121 Big Tree Road in Seattle, NV".