...and so your pattern of rubbishing dissenters continues, I see, Charles.
Oh well, some things never change. In spite of the fact Blacketer, or
whatever he is calling himself, was a little devious (I don't blame him
changing from his real name), his edits to David Cameron's page were hardly
harmful or wildly inacurate. They have been rather blown out of proportion
by The Mail - if Blacketer were hell bent on politically prejudicing the
encyclopedia would hardly chose to sit on a committee with such as you for
two years discussing less than fascinating wiki-crimes. It's quite clear to
all that he was a dedicated Wikipedian with no raging political agenda and
that should be being vociferously shouted from the roof tops - it is not.
Giano
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Charles Matthews <
charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
Giacomo M-Z wrote:
Charles, I can understand that you are bitter at
having been so firmly
voted off the Arbcom, but you really should ask yourself why that was,
and try and draw some benefeits from the experience. Ths community
wanted change, a change that is from your Jimbo biased perspective. A
perspective which has got Wikipedia into this mess, that is my point -
nothing more.
Giano
Joining a thread and wandering completely and provocatively off-topic
like this has a name. It is called "trolling". Your "point" seems to
be
that wikien-l is as good a place as any to abuse all and sundry, and
drag up the past.
I would say that Jay Walsh's job is safe for the moment. You have zilch
to offer. A stock-in-trade of verbal bullying, shamelessness and
congealed revenges sounds more like the type of journalist who requires
handling, than someone who should be anywhere near the interface with
major media.
Charles
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l