On 8/27/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Jay has been communicative in email with Jimbo and
members of the arbcom.
-Matt
Don't members of the project deserve some sort of explanation,
particularly when he is under scrutiny in one ArbComm case and on ANI?
If there is no transparency then there is no ability for other admins
or users to respond (and possibly refute) whatever private
explanations Jayjg may have proffered for his actions. This is not how
an accountable, transparent project works.