For god's sake, the NYT -is- a publisher, and they linked to it all
over their official blog. You think their lawyers would have let them
do that, if there were any significant degree of risk?
On 5/3/07, Anthony <wikilegal(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 5/3/07, John Vandenberg <jayvdb(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 5/3/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
If they do DMCA Wired, then Wired get to go
first!
According to [[Universal v. Reimerdes]], DeCSS was a single case that
included all defendants. Does one party 'go first' in cases like
this?
MPAA would loose nothing by including Wikipedia in a suit against
Wired even if we only linked to the Wired article that published it,
after all that was the crux of the latter part of the DeCSS case: 2600
deep linking to other publishers.
The thing is, the WMF, unlike Wired, is not a publisher, or at least
is going to claim it's not a publisher. So the two cases would be
inherently different.
Anthony
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Freedom is the right to know that 2+2=4. From this all else follows.