On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:30 PM,
<WJhonson(a)aol.com> wrote:
I doubt that deleted stuff is libelous.
Libelous material is oversighted, not AfD'd which is what the mentioned
site
is archiving.
The mentioned site is not archiving oversighted material.
This is your oft-repeated version of how things *should be done* - not how
they are always done.
Even if it weren't I don't see how it's Wikimedia's problem. Wikimedia
isn't hosting the material and it isn't responsible for creating it so
if there's libel it's on the heads of the original author and perhaps on
Wikiunderground.
They can always use the same method Wikipedia does to deal with libel -
have policies against it and remove it whenever it's found.