On 26/04/07, Matthew Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
My concern (which is a general one, not just
specifically for this
case) is about the danger of taking things stated in a short sentence
as a principle in a specific arbitration case as being a complete and
full interpretation of the entirety of Wikipedia policy on that issue,
disallowing any nuance or complexity of interpretation.
The word for this is "excuse." It's quite difficult in ArbCom rulings
not to accidentally craft a handy stick for the foolish to wield.
- d.