On 11/1/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On the other hand... in this specific case, the
account was
established and we'd been letting it be used for quite a while. It
seems reasonable to expect that if we've tolerated a specific case
this long, and the user's not become vastly more disruptive or more
crazy, we should let it slide - because that's what policy is, it's a
description of what we do and how we go about things.
For me, the use in discussion was one thing, but the use to edit war
over a contentious link went over the line. Others may disagree.
-Matt