On 4/20/06, maru dubshinki <marudubshinki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We shouldn't examine that data, however. Very bad
precedent, and poor
for privacy, especially since we aren't dealing with out-and-out
vandals here, but merely critics.
If the circumstantial evidence provided is valid, this is far worse
than vandalism. This is people in a position of trust abusing it and
possibly exposing Wikipedia to liability for copyright infringement or
defamation by causing such material to be published.