If the admin knows full well that the request was made
by a banned user
over an article the user created while banned, and was then deleted
under G5, then the admin is going against clear policy in carrying out
the undelete. In that case, it is not an assumption of bad faith to say
the admin is conspiring with a banned user to evade clear policy.
Especially when
other evidence indicates a financial or business
relationship between the banned user and the article subject, which
is the case in this particular instance.
Where was financial interest previously
mentioned in the thread. You're
referring to facts that were not on the table. You can't expect others
to take into account what has not been said.