On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 16:05:04 -0500, Risker <risker.wp(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Interesting you should say that, Guy. I quite agree
that there is a
difference, and that it is very bad to confuse the two. But BADSITES most
certainly involved libel, although you may not have been aware of it, as you
were not actively participating in the discussion at the time. Perhaps
knowing this will give you some context as to why many of us are extremely
wary of the entire concept.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAttack_sites&diff…
It's not clear to me why one would support linking to defamation any
more than we would support linking to libel, copyright violation or
any other kind of content that violates the law.
BADSITES was absolutely not "all about" libel. Not at all.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG