On 28 March 2011 15:46, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
However, noting what the subject says is surely
apposite in the
general case, even if it's delusional - as long as it can be
reasonably cited in a source that is almost certainly said subject.
Not really the case article in question is Giovanni di Stefano. A
fraudster (he has a conviction from the 80s). Using his own words
presents two problems. Firstly it would accuse of being technically
guilty of things I'm pretty sure he isn't. Secondly one of the lines
he was trying to push has just been reported on by the crown
prosecution service:
"The charges refer to events between 2004 and 2009 and the alleged
deceptions include representations that he was a qualified Italian
lawyer."
http://www.cps.gov.uk/news/press_statements/cps_statement_on_giovanni_di_st…
You see the problem?
--
geni