On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, MuZemike
<muzemike(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We must also take into account the popularity
factor when it comes to
comparing WMF wikis. It is obvious of the advantage Wikipedia has over
all the other wikis in that is immensely more popular and is received
much more widely than all other wikis.
After pondering that for a while, one can conclude that we have come
full-circle with regards to previous thread, which discussed briefly
the
dominance and level of "monopoly" Wikipedia has over the
freely-editable
portion of the Internet.
...Hmm.
I guess it's a good sign, if we think of the positives, that in some
areas our closest credible competition for WP is another WMF project.
8-)
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com
Ok, hold that thought.
How about creating, within Wikimedia, a fork which incorporates some or
all of the ideas we've been discussing. For example a dictionary which
does discuss the development of concepts at length.
Fred Bauder