On 8/15/07, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 14/08/07, George Herbert
<george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wikipedia is not a reliable source (specifically
disclaimed); your
logic, taken to its conclusion, would suggest that we cannot use
negative incidents in our own edit histories as discussion fodder for
RFAs.
Didn't we rehash this debate recently? A source can be generally
unreliable and yet still reliable for the purposes of determining what
it itself said...
I was trying to point out the absurdity of overextending BLP like
this. I don't actually think that we should turn a blind eye to our
own logs or edit histories...
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com