On 11/27/07, Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
This is nothing less than an attempt to subvert the
Arbcom process.
From the beginning the Arbcom was set up as a body to hear appeals of
admin actions such as blocking. Running things by the Arbcom *before*
taking administrative action means that any appeals will be against a
stacked deck.
This is the most intelligent comment made by anyone thusfar in this thread.
—C.W.