On 30 May 2007 at 12:59:56 -0400, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
WR doesn't qualify for citation under [[WP:V]] or
[[WP:RS]].
That straw man has resurfaced so many times that I'm tempted to coin
a new term, "[[Bobblehead doll]] argument", for one which keeps
bouncing back up every time it's knocked down.
As others have said, it's not as a source in an article that anybody
has been or intends on using that site (except perhaps for a future
article on the site itself, if it should become sufficiently notable,
or maybe on [[Criticisms of Wikipedia]] -- the sole thing that it
would ever be a source for would be about itself and the views
espoused by its participants). The places it might turn up include
discussion and project pages, which are not subject to WP:V, WP:RS,
or even WP:NPOV.
--
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site:
http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips:
http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site:
http://domains.dan.info/