On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 17 May 2012 12:54, WereSpielChequers
<werespielchequers(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, unless I read this wrong you are admitting to
100 random vandalisms of
Wikipedia? If so please stop your experiment now and revert any vandalisms
not yet spotted.
Indeed. Then read WP:POINT.
Oh c'mon, even the updated terms of use allow for limited
vulnerability testing which is not *unduly* disruptive.