On 4/22/07, Jeff Raymond <jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
On 4/22/07, David Gerard
<dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
OK. What seems a practical first move?
We might consider deleting bios someone considers consistently
libellous,
but it's pointless to delete articles that
otherwise don't pose a
problem.
I mean, we could simply stub the unsourced articles with a note on the
talk page and force a fresh start. That would placate both sides of the
coin - no actual subject content is lost, but we lose the worry of the
unsourced statements for now.
-Jeff
Isn't removing unsourced material already allowed through BLP rules?
The problem is returning vandals. How is patrolling of those bios organized?