On 5/3/07, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It is nearly inevitable that this is going to be a
case where all
MPAA's horses won't be able to put humpty dumpty back together again,
and after it becomes definitively obvious that is the case of affairs,
and the number indeed has spread far, wide and into authoritative
information outlets, we can safely go with the de facto
non-enforcement of what rights (or not, as the case may in the de jure
sense have been) MPAA might have had to prevent disclosure.
Except the MPAA are going to have to think about the future. There are
other such numbers that they do not wish to become public. If they
think they can win such lawsuits sueing say the 10 highest profile
distrubuters would be a fairly logical activity.
--
geni