On Thursday 16 July 2009, FT2 wrote:
::Archived at:
http://marc.info/?i=e71d9fab0907161320j56d701abi481968d1875db570@mail.gmail…
Update: I've now checked the case, and yes I had heard of this matter. But
being on a break for the last few weeks to deal with real-world matters, I
hadn't made the connection just from the words "Rohde/NYT". I checked
which
article with Rohde in the title, also covered the NYT as well. Luckily there
was only one.
Huh, that surprises me, because right in the history log we see that Rohde was kidnapped:
[[
(cur) (prev) 277165071277165071 11:43, 14 March 2009 Vrv2764 (talk | contribs) (4,707
bytes) (Added report of possible kidnaqpping in Afghanistan) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 277062968277062968 22:23, 13 March 2009 Cbrown1023 (talk | contribs) (4,575
bytes) (Undid revision 277012138 by 70.79.212.223 (talk); see WP:Reliable sources and
WP:BLP) (undo)
(cur) (prev) 277012138277012138 17:47, 13 March 2009 70.79.212.223 (talk) (5,626 bytes)
(Added info on 2008 kidnapping with references) (undo)
]]
I even said this to the NYT reporter when I spoke to him and he implied that this
information had been suppressed... So that's two possible wrinkles from the original
story:
1. The page was protected, but nothing more.
2. The kidnappers had asked that the information be suppressed as part of their demands,
rather than this being the initiative of NYT.