Zoe wrote:
--- Daniel Ehrenberg
<littledanehren(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
well that doesn't prohibit unrevereting of
his good
edits, does it? --LittleDan
Yes, it does. There is no such thing as a good
Michael edit. Unless you want to to go the trouble of
verifying that every single thing he wrote was
correct, don't even try to think that there is a good
Michael edit.
Yeah, but they're gradually improving, at least in the examples I've
seen. His attitude, unfortunately, isn't though.
Spoke too soon. Sorry 'bout that.