on 1/13/09 8:36 AM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com wrote:
When consensus is reached the relevant pages are
updated accordingly. In
general major changes (such as the one in discussion) is voted upon by the
entire community. Not five or six editors but hundreds of editors. The
voting happens after there is an agreement on the general principles - even
if such an agreement is partial or temporary.
WC, how is it determined that this agreement has been reached?
During the vote people are
given the option to support/oppose different approaches.
Is there a set time for the vote? And, if so, how is it set?
Marc
- White Cat
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Marc Riddell
<michaeldavid86(a)comcast.net>wrote;wrote:
on
1/13/09 2:33 AM, White Cat at wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com wrote:
In other words there is a lack of consensus. Meaning no mass action of
any
kind should be taken until a consensus is
secured.
On any given subject within the Project, how does someone go about
achieving
consensus? And how and when do you determine that a consensus has been
reached?
Marc Riddell
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l