I think there have been some discussions at WP:RSN about whether it is
a sufficiently reliable source for negative BLP. My own opinion would
be that it is not, and neither is the Guardian.
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)fairpoint.net> wrote:
note Fox News is excluded from this list:
External links
* Collected news and coverage at The New York Times
* Collected news and coverage at The Guardian
* Collected news and coverage at CNN
* Tea Party Movement at History News Network at George Mason University
* Tea Party Movement at SourceWatch
I can make a good faith argument that it is not a reliable source, as I
could for any other news source with obvious bias, but I don't think
there would be consensus on that point.
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG