2008/4/23 Relata Refero <refero.relata(a)gmail.com>om>:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Nathan
<nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> My idea of a comprehensive review includes at
least
> some examination of the edits of an editor prior to the implementation of
> a
> ban. Not everyone agrees. Sometimes efficient review is stifled by a low
> signal to noise ratio (cliched as that phrase has become these days). I
> think that has happened in this case, but hopefully the Committee if it
> chooses to accept the case can cut through the noise and make a
> determination.
That would be a first. More likely silence for a
fortnight followed by a
reminder to follow our core policies and a general amnesty.
If I were them I'd just advise them to ask people to pay a hell of a
lot of attention to the pages of interest, with the finest of
attention to NPOV writing whatever the participant's personal views. I
really can't think of a better answer to problems like this.
And if they're such fans of Jayjg, maybe he can lead them into
sensible NPOV contribution ;-)
(Jay, that's a job buzzing around and looking for you. "Your mission,
should you fail to evade it ...")
- d.