Hello Brian,
sorry for replying so late, but you should definitely check out Semantic MediaWiki: [
https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/ |
https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org ]
In conjunction with PageForms and External Data extensions, I showed a small demo how to
semi-automatically reference to Wikdata IDs. The form is looking up a newly to be created
entry and suggests the Wikidata ID in the form field.
[
https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/CC0878458455 |
https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/CC0878458455 ]
regards,
Bernhard
----- Am 18. Jun 2020 um 8:26 schrieb Brian M. Watson <b.m.watson.1989(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello all,
I'm writing at the recommendation of Mairelys
Lemus-Rojas after I approached her
with the below inquiry and exchanged some emails about it.
I was wondering if anyone was familiar with a
semantic/linked data capable
content management system or blog that has autofill or nanotation capabilities.
What I mean by that is, say I'm writing a blog post about Paris, I'm looking
for something that would autofill linked data 'under the hood' by either a
dropdown (a la Omeka's [
https://omeka.org/s/modules/ValueSuggest/ | Value
Suggest ] ), a autofill (a la wikidata/pedia) or something that creates
semantic blog tags.
I've seen a (very) bleeding-edge technology/proof
of concept called [
http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/07/nanotation.html | nanotation ] that looks
about right, but might be completely different then what I actually want, which
is to find something that incorporates linked data, autofills URIs, and works
like a blog/content management system.
So far I've explored
*
> Recogito ( [
https://recogito.pelagios.org/ |
https://recogito.pelagios.org/ ] )
> is lovely but focused on annotating images/maps/preexisting items.
*
> Catma ( [
https://catma.de/ |
https://catma.de/ ] ) is lovely looking but builds
> off preexisting texts, not creating new texts (i.e. you'd have to write the
> text and then annotate it all.). It seems to be a Voyant on steroids.
> Nonetheless if I could combine Recogito and Catma, that'd be neat. The same
> program (? project?) also puts out forText ( [
https://fortext.net/ |
>
https://fortext.net/ ] ), which i just include here as it's also nice.
*
> [
http://dokie.li/ | dokie.li ] ( [
https://dokie.li/ |
https://dokie.li/ ] )
> This seems the closest, as it's focused on article publishing, annotations and
> social interactions, but unfortunately, setting up a Solid Server remains quite
> the technical hurdle for me
*
> Atomgraph ( [
https://atomgraph.com/ |
https://atomgraph.com/ ] ) is knowledge
> graph oriented and installed upon previously-existing data, not focused on
> content management. Gephi on steroids.
*
> Webanno ( [
https://webanno.github.io/webanno/ |
>
https://webanno.github.io/webanno/ ] ) which is specifically targeted at
> linguistically annotating the internet, not really creating content.
*
> Wikibase : A heavily modified wikibase might be what I'm left with. In this
> scenario I'd make a Mediawiki, turn it into Wikibase, and kinda hack a blog out
> of it. Less than satisfying but would work if needed.
*
> I also tried wiki.js (SUCH A NICE INTERFACE, but it doesn't support linked data
> yet) and OntoWiki (which looks like it also builds off a preexisting knowledge
> graph)
*
> Anthologize : ( [
https://anthologize.org/ |
https://anthologize.org/ ] ) also
> looks very close as a wordpress plugin but it is not linked-data specific so I
> didn't explore ways to make it so.
*
My longterm goal with this is to create semantic
libguides and blogs. I really
do think semantic libguides are NEARLY possible—maybe an API that pulls
knowledge graphs along and wikidata visualizations, along with some blog-type
software... I think it could be done, and I have some bits and pieces of it,
but not quite the whole sandwich (so to speak).
I'm partially doing this with an ALA grant I got
for [
http://www.histsex.com/ |
www.histsex.com ] (soon to be [
http://www.histsex.org/ |
www.histsex.org ]
just in case you're clicking that in a week or so!). This "bibliography" is
all
in omeka and it works effectively like a libguide, but will need further
plugins to make it all work as desired, so I continue to investigate
alternatives.
Perhaps this is something that a grant will be needed
to do in a broader way? Or
is there something obvious I've missed here?
Thank you all for your time!
--
BRIAN M. WATSON
they/them
[
https://twitter.com/brimwats | twitter ] - [
https://brimwats.com/ | website ]
PhD: [
https://slais.ubc.ca/ | UBC SLAIS ]
Director: [
https://histsex.com/ |
HistSex.org ]
Editorial Board: [
http://homosaurus.org/about | Homosaurus ]
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata