While Wikidata certainly has concerns to deal with about accuracy and
vandalism, I think we need to push back against this mindset that Wikipedia
works perfectly while Wikidata is this unregulated free-for-all. I've run
into editors on en.wp objecting to a Wikidata infobox displaying the very
same information that was unsourced in that Wikipedia article for nearly a
decade. Both are a work in progress, both can do better, and these should
not be barriers to progress or integration.
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Andy Mabbett <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk>
wrote:
On 19 September 2017 at 19:18, Dario Taraborelli
<dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
I wanted to draw your attention to a deletion
nomination discussion for
an
experimental template – {{Cite Q}} – pulling
bibliographic data from
Wikidata:
Closed as "no consensus"; it's worth reading the full comment:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templa
tes_for_discussion/Log/2017_September_15&curid=55240730&
diff=803445497&oldid=803444684
--
Meta:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiCite
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/wikicite
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"wikicite-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to wikicite-discuss+unsubscribe(a)wikimedia.org.