Hi Andrew,
I would also look at edit tags [1], which capture many edits from
OAuth-based tools that don't leave an identifying word in the edit
summary field (example: reCh [2]).
You can query these using the change tag table [3].
[1]
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Tags (may take some time to load)
[2] e.g.
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?limit=50&title=Special%3AContribut…
[3]
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Change_tag_table
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Hall <hall1467(a)umn.edu> wrote:
Hello,
I’m doing some analyses in which I want to identify Wikidata edits done via
editing tools (e.g. via QuickStatements, etc…). To identify these edits,
I've first flagged and removed bot edits and then I’ve generated a list of
the 1000 most popular revision comment words (ignoring case and some
punctuation characters as part of this process). Within this list of words,
I've identified 15 words that I believe indicate tool edits. I’ve included
these 15 words below.
Does anyone know of tool edits that would be missed if I search for
revisions that contain one of these 15 words in their comments? Put another
way, are there editing tools not listed below? If so, can I identify edits
from those tools from revision comments?
#quickstatements
#petscan
#autolist2
autoedit
nameguzzler
labellister
#itemcreator
#dragrefjs
[[useryms/lc|lcjs]]
#wikidatagame
[[wikidataprimary
#mix'n'match
mix'n'match
#distributedgame
[[userjitrixis/nameguzzlerjs|nameguzzler]]
Thanks in advance,
Andrew Hall
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
--
Tilman Bayer
Senior Analyst
Wikimedia Foundation
IRC (Freenode): HaeB