Hello,
Sorry, but what has "the new head of the WMF" to do with the community matters
of Wikidata?
Greetings,
Sjoerd de Bruin
sjoerddebruin(a)me.com
Op 31 jul. 2016, om 19:18 heeft Info WorldUniversity
<info(a)worlduniversityandschool.org> het volgende geschreven:
Thanks Andy for helping focus these developing process questions. What role could the new
head of the WMF play here in positive regards?
Regards, Scott
On Jul 31, 2016 10:09 AM, "Andy Mabbett" <andy(a)pigsonthewing.org.uk
<mailto:andy@pigsonthewing.org.uk>> wrote:
On 31 July 2016 at 16:43, Adrian Raddatz <ajraddatz(a)gmail.com
<mailto:ajraddatz@gmail.com>> wrote:
my personal opinion is that these items are
fine as well. But (and here's the important thing), it's not a big deal
either way. The site will continue, and this especially should not be a time
for trying to force an opinion one way or the other onto the community. :-)
The big deal is about how we decide how Wikidata policies are applied
- do we seek to obtain community consensus, or do we allow involved
admins to decide by fait accompli?
--
Andy Mabbett
@pigsonthewing
http://pigsonthewing.org.uk <http://pigsonthewing.org.uk/>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org <mailto:Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata>
_______________________________________________
Wikidata mailing list
Wikidata(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata