On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Tom Morris <tfmorris(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Stas Malyshev
<smalyshev(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
From a machine processing point of view, a more interesting statement is probably:
wd:Q1000336 owl:sameAs <https://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.03pvzn>
Yes, but this proposal matches part of the discussion... owl:sameAs is
in many cases not appropriate and likely should not be the goal in the
first place: in many cases there is not such a clear 1-to-1 relation,
and even if there is a 1-to-1 relation, the above may still be
inappropriate.
Egon
--
E.L. Willighagen
Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT
Maastricht University (
http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/)
Homepage:
http://egonw.github.com/
LinkedIn:
http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
Blog:
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList:
http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
ORCID: 0000-0001-7542-0286
ImpactStory:
https://impactstory.org/EgonWillighagen