The label and the description together are meant to be identifying.
I.e. "Georgia - A country in central Asia", or "Frankfurt - A city in
Hesse, Germany", etc.
Additionally, the Wikipedia links provide quite some guidance to it.
Cheers,
Denny
2012/4/5 Gregor Hagedorn <g.m.hagedorn(a)gmail.com>
Wikidata can
(and probably will) store information about each moon of
Uranus, e.g., its mass. It does probably not make sense to store the
mass of
"Moons of Uranus" if there is such an
article. It does not help to know
that
the article "Moons on Uranus" also
talks (among other things) about some
moon that has a particular mass: you need to know what *exactly* you are
talking about to exploit this data. An article on "Moons of Uranus" could
still (eventually) embed Wikidata data to improve its display, but this
data
must refer to individual moons, not to the
article as a whole.
The problem I see is that you have no definition to which real object
the data are tied. We agree that the problem is not the interwiki
links per se. It is what results from it. How do we tie data to a
wikidata page when we don't know what it is about?
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-l mailing list
Wikidata-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-l
--
Project director Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. | Eisenacher Straße 2 | 10777 Berlin
Tel. +49-30-219 158 26-0 |
http://wikimedia.de
Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e.V.
Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter
der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für
Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/681/51985.