http://www.investorvlp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=252308&p=irol-stockquoteBryn…
On Nov 2, 2017 10:05 PM, robertdelacruz0430(a)gmail.com wrote:
Philipino Cuban Jakarata Japan Magic fedia Una Anatorio Iron Fist Stallin
First of Alis Hienzeal Alias Bryntzne Robert S Delacruz Robert M Delacruz
Robert G Delacruz Robert H Delacruz Robert X Delacruz Robert A
Delacruz.=====R1 No Change inner working HISTORIA B 4 SIR Hugene Issis
Eugene Promote Ur Culture Adapt or callapse Your Union Offenssive Windows
Brakeing Law Build a Wall Crisis Guallce Stand For ××× History Canada
Mexico France SouthWest Angle Saxon My Elizabathan English Palabras Racism
Destiny Do Donts pro Long Hebrew Pro Con Kings Men BloodLine You Cant Find
A Genration Century Late but Robert Downy I Am For All Under G.O.D you will
Moscow Seca Outline Above the Law OMB IBEW IMB Ant Vex Spectum Illuminate
sermon Homily 90s Illumanati Dela Cartels On the Way to a
Azillvillalilaliawilla Hallocaust
On Nov 2, 2017 5:40 PM, "Stas Malyshev" <smalyshev(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
Hi!
When showing labels from fallback languages we do have
little language
indicators in other places. I believe we should have this here as
Makes sense. I'll look into how to get those. Is language code OK or we
need full language name (uk vs. Ukrainian)?
One thing to note here is that secondary languages have no order - i.e.
if you look in German, and there's no matching German label, but there
are 10 other language labels all the same (happens a lot for names &
places), which language will be selected is anybody's guess. We could
add rule that says "look at English as secondary first", in theory, but
not sure whether we should - after all, besides having most languages,
(and us speaking it :) there's not much special about it.
I'm slightly leaning toward showing both.
OK.
I'd say in this case we could get rid of the
word/byte count. To get a
good glimpse of the quality of the item I'd say we'd want to show
count of statements (excluding identifier statements), identifiers and
sitelinks.
OK, I'll try to make this.
> 5. Display format for Wikidata and for other
wikipedia sites is
different:
Wikpedia:
Title
Snippet
Wikidata:
Title: Description
I.e. Wikipedia puts title on a separate line, while Wikidata keeps it on
the same line, separated by colon. Is there any reason for this
difference? Do we want to go back to the common format?
Not sure if we had a reason tbh.
OK then, I'll feel free to shuffle things around then :) Having more
freedom in the title line is good because we can then display both label
& aliases.
Thanks!
--
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev(a)wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikidata-tech mailing list
Wikidata-tech(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-tech