Im all for startling sentences and, given how lazy some reviewers are,
put it in the title if you can! To use the Kent Beck example
Network Garbage Collection: Fast and Easy!
Would make a fine title, and note that it contains a colon in the title.
Papers with colons in the title are cited more. When I first heard this, I
was dubious. One day I happened to have a spreadsheet with all the papers in
our universitys ePrints system which included bibliometric data, so I put
it to the test and, yes, it seems to be quite true. The titles-with-colons
were indeed a lot more cited on average than those without. Why? I dont
know, but I have a few theories its probably a worthy subject for
research!
But, back to startling sentences. Its a common technique used in lots of
forms of writing to grab and hold the readers attention from the first
sentence (so they will buy the book or whatever) its usually called the
hook if you are googling (as in fishing for a reader). The past is
another country; they do things differently there, Last night I dreamt I
went to Mandalay again and the all-time classic It was a dark and stormy
night (a hook now so famous thanks to Snoopy that nobody even remembers the
book).The use of the hook is well-known but not it seems in academic
writing for which the gold standard is to be as boring as possible :-)
Kerry
_____
From: Ward Cunningham [mailto:ward@c2.com]
Sent: Thursday, 8 November 2012 10:10 AM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Cc: kerry.raymond(a)gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Unaffiliated researchers
I always liked Kent Beck's patterns for a successful oopsla submission,
especially "one startling sentence":
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~wcook/papers/HowToGetaPaperAcceptedToOOPSLA/HowToG
etAPaperAcceptedToOOPSLA.htm
This was from a time that oopsla was big and important. It was also a
conference that actively sought industry collaboration. Notice that all of
the panelists were from industry.
On Nov 7, 2012, at 3:32 PM, Manuel Palomo Duarte wrote:
I agree with Kerry, unaffiliated are unusual, but I've never heard of them
been discriminated in any way when publishing ...
2012/11/7 Kerry Raymond <kerry.raymond(a)gmail.com>
I am not an unaffiliated researcher (but I guess I might be after my
imminent retirement). But having been involved in editorial boards and
conference programme committees etc, I have never been aware of any
restriction on unaffiliated researchers publishing research. I would say
though that it is fairly unusual to receive papers from unaffiliated authors
and I think the couple of times I have encountered the situation the papers
were very poor quality. But they were reviewed in the normal way and
rejected on their merits. But had the papers been of better quality, then I
presume they would have been accepted. On what basis could a reviewer or
editor legitimately discriminate against unaffiliated authors?
Kerry
_____
From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:wiki-research-l-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of emijrp
Sent: Wednesday, 7 November 2012 9:12 PM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Unaffiliated researchers
Hi all;
I wonder if there are unaffiliated researchers in this mailing list. I know
that publishing without affiliation is a bit hard, so I would like to talk
with them and learn from their experience.
Regards,
emijrp
--
Emilio J. Rodríguez-Posada
http://LibreFind.org <http://LibreFind.org/> - The wiki search engine
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
Prof. Manuel Palomo Duarte, PhD
Software Process Improvement and Formal Methods group (SPI&FM).
Degree Coordinator for Computer Science.
Department of Computer Science.
Escuela Superior de Ingenieria.
C/ Chile, 1
11002 - Cadiz (Spain)
University of Cadiz
http://neptuno.uca.es/~mpalomo
Tlf: (+34) 956 015483
Mobile phone: (+34) 649 280080
Mobile phone from University network: 45483
Fax: (+34) 956 015139
Aviso legal: Este mensaje (incluyendo los ficheros adjuntos) puede contener
información confidencial, dirigida a un destinatario y objetivo específico.
Si usted no es el destinatario del mismo le pido disculpas, y le pido que
elimine este correo, evitando cualquier divulgación, copia o distribución de
su contenido, así como desarrollar o ejecutar cualquier acción basada en el
mismo.
--
Legal Notice: This message (including the attached files) contains
confidential information, directed to a specific addressee and objective. In
case you are not the addressee of the same, I apologize. And I ask you to
delete this mail, and not to resend, copy or distribute its content, as well
as develop or execute any action based on the same.
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l