Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

[nan-l] 2014 ACM Web Science...

Finding Quality Assessment Table...

Dario Taraborelli

24 Feb 2014 24 Feb '14

4:11 p.m.

Hi everybody, with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1] Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we’re experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list. Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter

Show replies by date

Klein,Max

24 Feb 24 Feb

11:39 p.m.

Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the signpost in time. 25th? Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023 ________________________________________ From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review Hi everybody, with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1] Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we’re experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list. Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Tilman Bayer

25 Feb 25 Feb

5:26 a.m.

New subject: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

...

Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the signpost in time. 25th? Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023 ________________________________________ From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review Hi everybody, with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1] Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list. Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB

Heather Ford

9:11 a.m.

New subject: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Thanks, Dario, Tilman! I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think... Best, Heather. Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk> Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters <http://ethnographymatters.net> | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=115> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa <http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa> On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:

...

Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the

signpost in time. 25th?

Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023 ________________________________________ From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <

wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org>

Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has

an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities

Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open

for review

Hi everybody, with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we

have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1]

Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and

add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome.

Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're

experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list.

Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Tilman Bayer

5:16 p.m.

New subject: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Hi Heather, that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue, let's follow up offlist if more information is needed. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <hfordsa(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Thanks, Dario, Tilman! I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think... Best, Heather. Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group http://hblog.org | @hfordsa On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:

Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the signpost in time. 25th? Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023 ________________________________________ From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review Hi everybody, with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1] Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list. Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB

Klein,Max

8:35 p.m.

New subject: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Great idea Heather, I will add my name to my review. Do you know any other review sites that aggregate in a wiki way that we could emulate? Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023 ________________________________________ From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:16 AM To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics. Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review Hi Heather, that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue, let's follow up offlist if more information is needed. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <hfordsa(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Thanks, Dario, Tilman! I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think... Best, Heather. Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group http://hblog.org | @hfordsa On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:

Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into the signpost in time. 25th? Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023 ________________________________________ From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario Taraborelli <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia content and communities Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review Hi everybody, with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the Research Newsletter [1] Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As usual, short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to analytics-l and wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process feel free to get in touch off-list. Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Heather Ford

27 Feb 27 Feb

10:45 a.m.

New subject: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Hi Max :) Thanks for adding your name to the review! Not quite sure I understand your question about other wiki sites that we could emulate? The research newsletter is pretty much single author per review so it's not really done in a 'wiki way' (e.g. by many authors producing a single review) other than using wiki software so I don't think anything is needed other than simply adding the byline next to the headline of the review as well as to at the top of the newsletter as per current practice. I'm thinking that these bylines wouldn't be needed for the snippets but rather for the more significant reviews. What do you think? Or were you asking about other methods of actually producing the signpost? Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk> Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters <http://ethnographymatters.net> | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group <http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/projects/?id=115> http://hblog.org | @hfordsa <http://www.twitter.com/hfordsa> On 25 February 2014 20:35, Klein,Max <kleinm(a)oclc.org> wrote:

...

Great idea Heather, I will add my name to my review. Do you know any other review sites that aggregate in a wiki way that we could emulate? Maximilian Klein Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC +17074787023 ________________________________________ From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org < wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Tilman Bayer < tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 9:16 AM To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities Cc: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has an interest in Wikipedia and analytics. Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review Hi Heather, that's a cool idea, and we have actually been considering something like this already. While the names of the reviewers are prominently displayed in the byline on top (and also, many readers of the Signpost and the newsletter are of course experienced in reading version histories), showing them next to each review might be make attribution easier. We just haven't found the time to implement it yet, like with many other things for the newsletter. You are welcome to figure out a suitable format and add these attributions in the upcoming issue, let's follow up offlist if more information is needed. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 1:11 AM, Heather Ford <hfordsa(a)gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks, Dario, Tilman! I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer

names/usernames

to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting

some

very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily

(although

I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social

science

research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think... Best, Heather. Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group http://hblog.org | @hfordsa On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote: > > Hi Max, > > yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline > is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date > is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might > take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing > up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to > reading your summary! > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <kleinm(a)oclc.org> wrote: > > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into

the

> > signpost in time. 25th? > > > > Maximilian Klein > > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC > > +17074787023 > > > > ________________________________________ > > From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org > > <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario

Taraborelli

> > <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM > > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who has > > an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into Wikimedia > > content and communities > > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers

open

> > for review > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we > > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the

Research

> > Newsletter [1] > > > > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and > > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As

usual,

> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. > > > > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're > > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to

analytics-l and

> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process

feel

free to get in touch off-list. Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Juliana Bastos Marques

26 Feb 26 Feb

12:49 a.m.

New subject: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Do you publish on papers in languages other than English? Juliana. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:

...

Thanks, Dario, Tilman! I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer

names/usernames

to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting

some

very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily

(although

I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social

science

the

Taraborelli

open

> > for review > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up we > > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the

Research

> > Newsletter [1] > > > > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and > > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As

usual,

> > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. > > > > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're > > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to

analytics-l and

> > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process

feel

_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

-- www.domusaurea.org

Tilman Bayer

1:17 a.m.

New subject: Upcoming research newsletter: new papers open for review

Hi Juliana, yes, English-language summaries of papers in other languages are welcome - in the draft for the current issue you can already see a review of a German paper that discusses Wikipedia's linguistic norms and style as a case study for the development of academic language, and on the Etherpad todo list there's a Russian language paper that claims to have discovered "unacceptable logic violations" in the English Wikipedia's category graph. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Juliana Bastos Marques <domusaurea(a)gmail.com> wrote:

...

Do you publish on papers in languages other than English? Juliana. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:

Thanks, Dario, Tilman! I was wondering whether it would be helpful to add reviewer names/usernames to individual signpost reviews. I was struck while reading a review of a paper on Signpost recently that I felt like the reviewer was inserting some very opinionated statements about the article rather than the regular summaries. While I don't think that this is a problem necessarily (although I wish that they were a bit more informed about the topic and social science research in general), I do think it can be problematic to have these comments unattributed. Would be interested to hear what others think... Best, Heather. Heather Ford Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme EthnographyMatters | Oxford Digital Ethnography Group http://hblog.org | @hfordsa On 25 February 2014 05:26, Tilman Bayer <tbayer(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:

Hi Max, yes, we're co-publishing with the Signpost, so the ultimate deadline is the Signpost's actual publication time. Its formal publication date is this Wednesday (the 26th) UTC, although actual publication might take place several hours or even a few days later. Thanks for signing up to review the "Editor's Biases" paper, I'm looking forward to reading your summary! On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Klein,Max <kleinm(a)oclc.org> wrote: > Dario, what's the timeframe for writing reviews so they can get into > the > signpost in time. 25th? > > Maximilian Klein > Wikipedian in Residence, OCLC > +17074787023 > > ________________________________________ > From: wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org > <wiki-research-l-bounces(a)lists.wikimedia.org> on behalf of Dario > Taraborelli > <dtaraborelli(a)wikimedia.org> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:11 AM > To: A mailing list for the Analytics Team at WMF and everybody who > has > an interest in Wikipedia and analytics.; Research into > Wikimedia > content and communities > Subject: [Wiki-research-l] Upcoming research newsletter: new papers > open > for review > > Hi everybody, > > with CSCW just concluded and conferences like CHI and WWW coming up > we > have a good set of papers to review for the February issue of the > Research > Newsletter [1] > > Please take a look at: https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/WRN201402 and > add your name next to any paper you are interested in reviewing. As > usual, > short notes and one-paragraph reviews are most welcome. > > Instead of contacting past contributors only, this month we're > experimenting with a public call for reviews cross-posted to > analytics-l and > wiki-research-l. if you have any question about the format or process > feel > free to get in touch off-list. > > Dario Taraborelli and Tilman Bayer > > [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Newsletter > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l -- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

-- www.domusaurea.org _______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

-- Tilman Bayer Senior Operations Analyst (Movement Communications) Wikimedia Foundation IRC (Freenode): HaeB

3724

days inactive

3727

days old

wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org

Manage subscription

8 comments

5 participants

tags (0)

participants (5)

Dario Taraborelli
Heather Ford
Juliana Bastos Marques
Klein,Max
Tilman Bayer