A complementary approach is to look at discussion threads in talk pages,
where issues are explicitly discussed, like we did in this study:
We are now rearranging the discussion parser and making it work for
other language editions, we plan to release the code as free software
soon. Feel free to contact me for any further information.
Best
David
On 20/08/13 10:55, Taha Yasseri wrote:
Dear Marcio,
On this page
http://wwm.phy.bme.hu/ , you can find some information
about how we have defined controversy in Wikipedia, how we measured
it, the results and the controversy scores for all articles in
different language editions and of course the software we developed to
do these.
Please do not hesitate to post me off-list if you have any question
regarding that.
bests
Taha
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Laura Hale <laura(a)fanhistory.com
<mailto:laura@fanhistory.com>> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Marcio Goncalves
<jornalistamarcio(a)ig.com.br <mailto:jornalistamarcio@ig.com.br>>
wrote:
Hello, folks,
Is there any free software in wich I can analyse the number of
controversies in a Wikipedia article?
Define controversy?
--
twitter: purplepopple
blog:
ozziesport.com <http://ozziesport.com/>
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
<mailto:Wiki-research-l@lists.wikimedia.org>
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
.t