Bumping to cc Yann on the thread as an experienced Wikisource user.
V/r
TJW/GMG
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 8:29 PM Jack Park <jackpark(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This sounds right to me. I suspect this might be the
first time I posted
here, but Stuart's comment makes sense. There really are several entities,
such as the activities of Paul Allen's institute's work in AI and
scholarship; but, if Wikipedia is to tie in with these cc-by research
documents, it seems to me that many of those documents are about topics
already in Wikipedia; linking to them, updating the Wikipedia topic to
reflect new information by way of deep interoperability and machine reading
techniques makes sense.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 3:25 PM Stuart A. Yeates <syeates(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Given that there are organisations already
organised, funded and
operating to preserve and promote open-access research, we might want
to think about focusing on getting deep interoperability with them,
rather than sucking all the content into Wikisource, where we can't
provide half the functionality that they can.
cheers
stuart
--
...let us be heard from red core to black sky
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 09:47, Timothy Wood <timothyjosephwood(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> This looks like a job for Wikisource. If nothing else, so long as we
can
> verify their CC licensing is compatible, we
can archive and preserve
them
> in perpetuity on WS. Unfortunately I've
scarcely contributed to WS
> personally. I've reached out to a WS admin that I know from Commons.
When
> they reply I'll cc them on this thread.
>
> V/r
> TJW/GMG
>
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 4:47 PM Alexandre Hocquet <
> alexandre.hocquet(a)univ-lorraine.fr> wrote:
>
> > On 17/04/2019 22:36, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
> > > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 at 08:29, Alexandre Hocquet wrote:
> > >> what? then a lot of wikipedia
> > >> articles should be labelled as {{secondary sources needed}})
> > > Exactly. Sourcing as a whole across wikipedia already relies too
> > > heavily on primary sources. I regularly tag articles as such.
> >
> > Well, fair enough then. Good luck for your crusade, and thanks for
your
>
interesting views about what constitutes primary, secondary and
> tertiary. I guess I now have an answer about how much sympathy my
> suggestion would bring.
>
>
> --
> ***********************************************
> Alexandre Hocquet
> Archives Henri Poincaré & Science History Institute
> Alexandre.Hocquet(a)univ-lorraine.fr
>
https://www.sciencehistory.org/profile/alexandre-hocquet
>
https://poincare.univ-lorraine.fr/fr/membre-titulaire/alexandre-hocquet
***********************************************
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l