Hello,
Several publications are in preparation... I will get back to you...
Thanks for your interest,
Ludovic BOCKEN
lbocken(a)gmail.com
www.ludovicbocken.com
Skype: ludovic.bocken
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ludovicbocken
2222 Rue Hochelaga,
Montréal, QC H2K 4N8
+1 (514) 649 0755
*Avis de confidentialité*
Le présent message transmis par télécopie est confidentiel, et son contenu
peut être protégé par le secret professionnel. Il est à l’usage exclusif de
son ou sa destinataire. Toute autre personne est par les présentes avisée
qu’il lui est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de
le reproduire. Si la ou le destinataire ne peut être joint ou vous est
inconnu, nous vous prions d’en informer immédiatement l’expéditeur ou
l’expéditrice et de détruire ce message et toute copie de celui-ci.
Le sam. 28 sept. 2019 à 08:00, <wiki-research-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
a écrit :
> Send Wiki-research-l mailing list submissions to
> wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> wiki-research-l-request(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> wiki-research-l-owner(a)lists.wikimedia.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Wiki-research-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Standardization of Wikipedia articles according to the
> lexical constancy of their introductions and body texts (Morten Wang)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 07:47:00 -0700
> From: Morten Wang <nettrom(a)gmail.com>
> To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
> <wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
> Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] Standardization of Wikipedia articles
> according to the lexical constancy of their introductions and body
> texts
> Message-ID:
> <CALkHm5AvzdMzxCLM2T=ZWVFwdRLWAZH0+N6dLpym-nN09d=
> 6rQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi Ludovic,
>
> This work sounds interesting, I'm looking forward to learning more about it
> as your papers come out!
>
> I read through the post on LinkedIn and from how I interpret it you are
> only looking at two quality classes (Features Articles vs other articles).
> This seems somewhat odd to me and I'd like to know more about why? The
> current trend when it comes to predicting article quality in the English
> Wikipedia does not limit the prediction problem to just FAs vs the rest,
> instead it's using the whole quality scale[1]. See the list below for some
> papers along this line of research.
>
> I'm also really curious about what "standardize the cognitive accessibility
> of Wikipedia" means? That might mean more than just "article quality",
> hence why I'm asking.
>
> All that being said, I think the approach sounds interesting and probably
> adds some signal, so I'm curious to learn more how it works and performs.
>
> References:
>
> - Warncke-Wang, M., Cosley, D., & Riedl, J. Tell me more: an actionable
> quality model for Wikipedia. OpenSym/WikiSym 2013. [We argue that
> metadata
> isn't useful because contributors can't change it]
> - Warncke-Wang, M., Ayukaev, V. R., Hecht, B., & Terveen, L. G. The
> success and failure of quality improvement projects in peer production
> communities. CSCW 2015. [See the Appendix for details of the improved
> model
> and how to get good training data]
> - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/ORES builds upon the 2015 paper and is
> a readily accessible API, reference datasets are available on figshare
> <
> https://figshare.com/articles/English_Wikipedia_Quality_Asssessment_Dataset…
> >
> and
> also in the GitHub repository
> <https://github.com/wikimedia/articlequality>. Now the benchmark to
> compare against, as in the three other papers listed below.
> - Dang, Q. V., & Ignat, C. L. Measuring quality of collaboratively
> edited documents: the case of Wikipedia. CIC 2016. [Shows that adding
> readability features can improve predictions]
> - Dang, Q. V., & Ignat, C. L. An end-to-end learning solution for
> assessing the quality of Wikipedia articles. OpenSym 2017. [Shows the
> performance of RNNs, also contains an important discussion of
> performance,
> interpretability, etc]
>
> I also came across this recent paper by Schmidt and Zangerle that reports
> significant improvements, but haven't yet had the time to read the paper
> closely:
>
> - Schmidt, M., & Zangerle, E. Article quality classification on
> Wikipedia: introducing document embeddings and content features. OpenSym
> 2019.
>
> Footnotes:
>
> 1. Typically without A-class articles due to how few of them they are.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Morten
>
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 at 13:09, Ludovic Bocken <lbocken(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am finishing my PhDs and I think that you could be interested in my
> last
> > main work about the quality of Wikipedia :
> >
> >
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/standardization-wikipedia-articles-according…
> > and in a future collaboration.
> >
> > I would be very grateful for your feedbacks ! Several publications are in
> > preparation... Let me know if you are interested in following this
> > thread...
> >
> > Have a nice week,
> >
> > Ludovic BOCKEN
> > lbocken(a)gmail.com
> > www.ludovicbocken.com
> > Skype: ludovic.bocken
> > http://www.linkedin.com/in/ludovicbocken
> > 2222 Rue Hochelaga,
> > Montréal, QC H2K 4N8
> > +1 (514) 649 0755
> >
> > *Avis de confidentialité*
> >
> > Le présent message transmis par télécopie est confidentiel, et son
> contenu
> > peut être protégé par le secret professionnel. Il est à l’usage exclusif
> de
> > son ou sa destinataire. Toute autre personne est par les présentes avisée
> > qu’il lui est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de
> > le reproduire. Si la ou le destinataire ne peut être joint ou vous est
> > inconnu, nous vous prions d’en informer immédiatement l’expéditeur ou
> > l’expéditrice et de détruire ce message et toute copie de celui-ci.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wiki-research-l mailing list
> > Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Wiki-research-l Digest, Vol 169, Issue 12
> ************************************************
>