From personal experience I would say that its quite hard for 1) as a
translator to guess at points where does a given sentence go, and what do
the numerous "$1" become in use 2) as a visitor to a site using the
translation to report or just know how and what to do to make the
translation better.
I think a solution like that of Facebook might be good: if you enable it in
the settings you would have a link in the corner that would say "translate"
you could click on anything on that given page and either provide the
translation for it, or review the translated version and the attached
comments (which then would have to be sent to TranslateWiki somehow).
Otherwise its quite tiresome for the end-user to go and find the actual
sentence again on TWiki (as the search doesn't search in the MediaWiki
namespace by default), and than make the change (or be turned away by fear
of disrupting something, after seeing the dollar signs for the included
sub-messages).
Regards,
Bence Damokos
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Aphaia <aphaia(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:54 AM, Erik Moeller
<erik(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
2008/8/2 Anders Wegge Jakobsen
<wegge(a)wegge.dk>dk>:
I will continue pointing out those hilarious
examples of
worse-than-none translations that ensues from the naive thought that
anyone will ever proofread a translation, when it has first been
marked as translated.
Perhaps it would be possible to add basic validation functionality
(not necessarily something as sophisticated as FlaggedRevs) to
TranslateWiki?
If it is, it is more than great I think. See also the thread about
http://jp.librarything.com
where they provide the registered users the way to evaluate the
current version, not only the opportunity to submit the alternative.
If the entire site has a feature to recommend an alternative to system
messages (since it is read-only for most visitors anyway), like Google
Translator gives its visitors, I think it better from the point of
proofreading, but not sure it is balanced with the other aspect &
workload.
Then the quality of a translation could be ranked
by
the number of people who have looked at and validated it.
--
Erik Möller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Support Free Knowledge:
http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate
_______________________________________________
Translators-l mailing list
Translators-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l
--
KIZU Naoko
http://d.hatena.ne.jp/Britty (in Japanese)
Quote of the Day (English):
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/WQ:QOTD
_______________________________________________
Translators-l mailing list
Translators-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l