2007/11/7, MinuteElectron
<minuteelectron(a)googlemail.com>om>:
My appologies, I didn't realise that this was
indeed official. However I
still maintain that it would be better to consolidate everything into
one Toolserver rather than have many different projects with no
coordination.
Well, I've just logged up to the "official" toolserver. The time
between I typed my password and the prompt showed up was about 15
seconds. I took a quick look at `uptime` to check the load - it was
high indeed, i got following output (after 5 seconds since pressing
enter):
dodek@hemlock:~$ uptime
17:45:59 up 40 days, 18:21, 26 users, load average: 229.20, 238.11, 198.69
Pretty high, isn't it? If only it was uptime... Then, I did the same
with Polish toolserver.
dodek@toolserv ~ $ uptime
17:25:02 up 241 days, 20:41, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Nice, isn't it? Every time I log there in, I'm sure I'll get enough CPU
time.
And, "we don't need no coordination" :) So far, our collaboration has
been in good state.
Perhaps if you combined your resources into one toolserver all users
would be able to share these CPU cycles, rather than users having to
decide whether to use the one with more human resource tools (i.e. JIRA,
FishEye etc.) or one with more availability. That way users can get the
best of both worlds.
MinuteElectron.